Panspermia is the idea that life on a planet can be established
by distribution from one celestial body to another, via natural means. The
original concept was proposed in 1865 by Hermann Eberhard Friedrich Richter and
over the years it has gained remarkable popularity (if not solid evidence).
Scientists are researching the potential for microbes to survive the harsh
environments of space, atmospheric entry and the impact on Earth necessary for
the hypothesis to be true. This may all sound suspiciously like Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus’
but I can assure you that the science is far more interesting than any mediocre
film could convey.
Past research has
suggested that DNA is highly vulnerable to destruction by cosmic radiation, but
another molecule call
ed RNA may have had the potential to kick-start life on
Earth. This is because RNA has the ability to reproduce without help (eg.
enzymes). It can, on its own, create secondary and tertiary structures which
could catalyse the production of other RNA molecules. If life on Earth started
off with an ‘RNA world’ and there was an eventual transition to DNA, then RNA-viruses
may have taken a role- if the Panspermia theory is to be believed. However, the
huge difficulty in this concept is that viruses need a host to survive (a
factor sadly lacking when forming new life on a planet) and unless evidence
suggests ancient viruses could live without this basic requirement, the
hypothesis falls flat.
While the Panspermia theory seemed dead in the (lifeless)
waters, later evidence has suggested that ancient life-forms may have been
capable of surviving the harsh atmospheric conditions of space. In 2011, it was
found that certain types of microbes (brilliantly named extremophiles for their
hardy resistance to the most extreme conditions- including nuclear reactors)
could survive in frozen environments such as underground lakes in Antarctica.
The adaptations necessary to live in such a severe environment would be
essential if they were to be successfully carried through space on ice-cold
comets. Furthermore, experimental data has proven that organic molecules could
survive prolonged atmospheric re-entry.
This week’s latest research suggests organic material can
survive the capture, transport and impact of a high force contact event. The
Darwin crater in Western Tanzania (a crater left from an impact with the earth
800,000 years ago) created impact glass due to the high temperature and
pressure associated with the collision. Analysis of the glass has found
surprising evidence for the organic remnants of the ancient ecosystem which was
hit by the meteor. This is the first study of its kind to present evidence of
life surviving either on the terrestrial surface or inside a meteorite that has
impacted Earth. While this research does
bring some weight to the Panspermia hypothesis, the Darwin crater is relatively
small and it has yet to be proven that life could survive a much bigger impact.
Though still only a theory, the Panspermia hypothesis does
have some weighty scientific evidence to pin down the more sci-fi elements. Life
on earth may not have extraterrestrial origins, but the potential for microbes
to survive in the most inhospitable environments may provide interesting
developments in the future.
Further reading:
Howard, K.T. et al. (2013). Biomass Preservation in Impact
Melt Ejecta [Online]. Natural Geoscience
(Advanced Online Publication). Available at: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo1996.html
(Accessed 14 Nov 2013).
Parrilli, E., Sannino, F., Marino, G. and Tutino, M.L.
(2011). ‘Life in Ice Habitats: New Insights Supporting Panspermia Theory’, Rendiconti Lincei, 22 (4), pp. 375-383.
Parnell, J. et al. (2011). ‘Preservation of Organic Matter
in the STONE 6 Artificial Meteorite Experiment’, Icarus, 212 (1), pp. 390-402.
Wesson, P.S. (2010) ‘Panspermia, Past and Present:
Astrophysical and Biophysical Conditions for the Dissemination of Life in
Space’, Space Science Review, 156
(1), pp. 239-252.
Credits: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/39057386@N02/4111291263/">Navicore</a> via <a href="http://compfight.com">Compfight</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">cc</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/31868255@N00/9664408476/">Rick Mach</a> via <a href="http://compfight.com">Compfight</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/">cc</a>
No comments:
Post a Comment